When building a Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) platform like Shopify, one of the most critical decisions you’ll make is choosing the right **multi-tenancy model**. Multi-tenancy is the architecture that allows a single application to serve multiple customers (tenants) while keeping their data and configurations isolated. But how do you decide which model is best for your platform? In this blog, we’ll break down the three main multi-tenancy models in simple terms, with **real-world examples** to help you understand.

---

## **What is Multi-Tenancy?**
Multi-tenancy is like an apartment building:
- A single building (application) houses multiple apartments (tenants).
- Tenants share the same infrastructure (e.g., plumbing, electricity) but have their own private spaces.
- In software, this means a single application serves multiple customers, with each customer’s data and configurations isolated from others.

Multi-tenancy is cost-effective, scalable, and easier to maintain compared to building a separate application for each tenant.

---

## **The Three Multi-Tenancy Models**
There are three main models for implementing multi-tenancy. Each has its pros and cons, and the best choice depends on your platform’s requirements.

---

### **1. Database per Tenant**
#### **How It Works**
- Each tenant gets their own **dedicated database**.
- All tenant-specific data is stored in their respective database.
- The application connects to the correct database based on the tenant.

#### **Real-World Example: WordPress.com**
- WordPress.com hosts millions of blogs and websites.
- Each blog (tenant) has its own database.
- For example:
  - `blog1_db` for Blog A.
  - `blog2_db` for Blog B.
- This ensures complete isolation between blogs, so one blog’s data doesn’t interfere with another’s.

#### **Pros**
- **High Isolation**: Tenants’ data is completely separated.
- **Easy Backup and Restore**: You can back up or restore a single tenant’s database without affecting others.
- **Customization**: Each tenant can have a unique database schema if needed.

#### **Cons**
- **Higher Cost**: Maintaining multiple databases can be expensive.
- **Complex Management**: Scaling and managing many databases can become challenging.
- **Resource Inefficiency**: If some tenants have low usage, their dedicated databases may waste resources.

#### **When to Use**
- When data isolation is critical (e.g., for compliance or security reasons).
- When tenants require highly customized database schemas.

---

### **2. Shared Database, Separate Schemas**
#### **How It Works**
- All tenants share the **same database**, but each tenant has its own **schema**.
- A schema is like a folder within the database that contains tables and data for a specific tenant.
- The application routes queries to the correct schema based on the tenant.

#### **Real-World Example: Salesforce**
- Salesforce is a SaaS platform that serves thousands of businesses.
- It uses a **shared database with separate schemas** for each tenant.
- For example:
  - A single database (`salesforce_db`) contains multiple schemas:
    - `companyA_schema` for Company A.
    - `companyB_schema` for Company B.
- This allows Salesforce to efficiently manage data while keeping it isolated at the schema level.

#### **Pros**
- **Moderate Isolation**: Tenants’ data is separated at the schema level.
- **Cost-Effective**: Fewer databases to manage compared to the “Database per Tenant” model.
- **Easier Scaling**: Adding new tenants is simpler since you don’t need to create a new database.

#### **Cons**
- **Limited Customization**: All tenants share the same database engine, so schema customization is limited.
- **Complex Queries**: Cross-tenant queries (if needed) can be complicated.

#### **When to Use**
- When you need a balance between isolation and cost.
- When tenants don’t require highly customized database schemas.

---

### **3. Shared Database, Shared Schema**
#### **How It Works**
- All tenants share the **same database and schema**.
- Tenant-specific data is distinguished using a **tenant identifier** (e.g., `tenant_id`) in each table.
- The application filters data based on the tenant identifier.

#### **Real-World Example: Shopify**
- Shopify is an e-commerce platform that serves millions of online stores.
- It uses a **shared database and shared schema** for smaller tenants.
- For example:
  - A single database (`shopify_db`) and schema (`shopify_schema`) store data for all stores.
  - Each table has a `tenant_id` column to identify which store the data belongs to.
  - When a customer visits a store, Shopify filters data using the `tenant_id` to show only that store’s products and orders.

#### **Pros**
- **Low Cost**: Only one database and schema to manage.
- **Efficient Resource Usage**: Resources are shared across all tenants.
- **Simpler Queries**: No need to switch databases or schemas.

#### **Cons**
- **Low Isolation**: Tenants share the same tables, so data leaks are possible if not handled carefully.
- **Complex Data Management**: You must ensure every query includes the `tenant_id` to avoid mixing data.
- **Limited Customization**: All tenants must use the same schema.

#### **When to Use**
- When cost and resource efficiency are top priorities.
- When tenants don’t require high levels of data isolation or customization.

---

## **Comparison Table**

| Feature                        | Database per Tenant       | Shared DB, Separate Schemas | Shared DB, Shared Schema |
|--------------------------------|---------------------------|-----------------------------|--------------------------|
| **Isolation**                  | High                     | Moderate                    | Low                     |
| **Cost**                       | High                     | Moderate                    | Low                     |
| **Customization**              | High                     | Moderate                    | Low                     |
| **Scalability**                | Challenging              | Easier                      | Easiest                 |
| **Management Complexity**      | High                     | Moderate                    | Low                     |

---

## **Which Model Should You Choose?**
Here’s a simple decision-making framework:
1. **Choose Database per Tenant** if:
   - Data isolation is critical (e.g., for compliance).
   - Tenants need highly customized schemas.
2. **Choose Shared Database, Separate Schemas** if:
   - You need a balance between isolation and cost.
   - Tenants don’t require heavy schema customization.
3. **Choose Shared Database, Shared Schema** if:
   - Cost and resource efficiency are top priorities.
   - Tenants don’t need high isolation or customization.

---

## **Conclusion**
Choosing the right multi-tenancy model is crucial for building a scalable, secure, and cost-effective SaaS platform. By understanding the pros and cons of each model, you can make an informed decision that aligns with your platform’s goals. Whether you prioritize isolation, customization, or cost-efficiency, there’s a multi-tenancy model that’s right for you.

If you’re just starting out, the **Shared Database, Separate Schemas** model is often a great middle ground. It offers a good balance of isolation, cost, and scalability, making it a popular choice for many SaaS platforms.

---

I hope this guide helped you understand multi-tenancy models with real-world examples! If you have any questions or need further clarification, feel free to ask. Happy building! 🚀

large_multi-tenancy.png

medium_multi-tenancy.png

small_multi-tenancy.png

thumbnail_multi-tenancy.png

multi-tenancy.png

Learn about multi-tenancy models (Database per Tenant, Shared DB with Separate Schemas, Shared DB with Shared Schema) with real-world examples like Shopify and Salesforce. Perfect for beginners building SaaS platforms.

Understanding Multi-Tenancy Models with Real-World Examples

Radicalloop